For established companies
Turn AI use into a controllable business lever.
We map where AI is used, which rules and evidence are missing, and which use case has economic value.
Thirty minutes. Bring the current use, open decision or regulatory question. We identify the right entry point.
Diagnosis
Four questions before the next AI project
If these answers are missing, another pilot cannot be assessed reliably from a commercial or operating perspective.
- 01Which AI systems are already in use?
- 02Which data and decisions do they affect?
- 03Which use case has measurable business value?
- 04Who owns approval, operation and ongoing control?
Working logic
Analysis, implementation, support
The first step provides a decision document. A live workflow only emerges from the subsequent implementation.
- 01
The right assessment
AI readiness, compliance and delivery are assessed separately. You receive status, priorities and the next scope.
- 02
One lever in operation
One prioritized workflow, governance element or delivery process is implemented with the accountable team.
- 03
Independence or support
Documentation, measurement and ownership move into your team. Ongoing support remains a separate decision.
Entry point
Which assessment answers your open question?
The offers separate commercial use, regulatory evidence and technical delivery, so the first piece of work stays specific and reviewable.
AI readiness
For active AI use without a complete inventory, prioritization or ownership model.
Review AI readiness →Regulatory compliance
For leaders who need to clarify applicability, gaps and the next evidence item.
Review the compliance check →Software delivery and performance
For rising IT costs with unclear delivery speed, quality or transparency.
Review the team assessment →Executive AI decision workshop
For executive teams that need to rank AI initiatives by business value, risk, data readiness and ownership, then commit to one next step.
Review the workshop →Test one process in practice
EIGENBAU
Test one process in practice
EIGENBAU is a one-day practical entry in Landsberg am Lech. You work on a real constraint and build a tool for daily work.
- One concrete work process is the focus
- You want to learn from your own case first
- A company-wide assessment is not yet needed
The format does not replace readiness assessment, governance implementation or technical integration into core systems.
This fits in these cases
- A concrete AI, compliance or delivery decision is open
- Relevant teams and documents are accessible
- Ownership for the next step can be assigned
- A limited scope is preferred over an open transformation programme
This is not the right step yet in these cases
- You only need a general trends presentation
- Neither decision makers nor specialists are available
- A certificate or legal opinion is the expected result
- Several use cases need to start without prioritization
Common questions
Which assessment comes first?
It depends on the open decision. If the question is where AI pays off commercially at all, the path starts with the AI readiness assessment. If a specific regulatory requirement is driving it, because a customer or a supervisor is asking for evidence, the compliance check is the faster entry. With rising IT cost and no visible cause, the dev team assessment fits. If you are unsure, we settle it within a few minutes in the first call.
Must implementation follow the assessment?
No. Every assessment ends with a standalone result: current state, priorities and a reasoned next scope. You can continue internally, hand it to another provider or do nothing. Implementation is a separate decision with its own proposal and is never attached automatically.
What does the EU AI Act change for us in practice?
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 has applied since 25 July 2026. For most mid-market users two points matter practically: the transparency obligations under Article 50 from 2 August 2026, and whether a system in use falls under Annex III, where obligations apply from 2 December 2027. The compliance check clarifies exposure, existing evidence and gaps. It is not legal advice and does not replace review by a lawyer. Source EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, timeline status 25/07/2026.
We only use AI in isolated spots. Is this worth it at all?
Especially then. The most common state in established companies is scattered use without an inventory: individual departments work with tools nobody tracks centrally, and nobody can say which use creates value and which creates risk. The readiness assessment makes exactly that inventory visible and sorts it by business value, risk and data situation.
Do you work with our IT department or around it?
With it. Without the responsible people from IT and the business side, nothing survives the end of the project. We bring the approach, the benchmark and decision discipline, your team brings system and process knowledge. At the end, documentation, measurement and ownership move to your team, not to a permanent external provider.
Is EIGENBAU the same as the executive AI workshop?
No. The executive AI workshop is for leadership and ends with a prioritized decision across several initiatives. EIGENBAU is a one-day format in Landsberg am Lech where participants work on a real constraint of their own and build a working tool. EIGENBAU is a separate brand with its own dates and pricing and replaces neither an assessment nor a governance implementation.
Which decision is open in your company?
We clarify whether readiness, compliance, delivery or an executive AI decision workshop is the right first step.
Discuss where to startThirty minutes. Bring the current use, open decision or regulatory question. We identify the right entry point.